Reference for Bava Kamma 5:2

הַקַּדָּר שֶׁהִכְנִיס קְדֵרוֹתָיו לַחֲצַר בַּעַל הַבַּיִת שֶׁלֹּא בִרְשׁוּת, וְשִׁבְּרָתַן בְּהֶמְתּוֹ שֶׁל בַּעַל הַבַּיִת, פָּטוּר. וְאִם הֻזְּקָה בָהֶן, בַּעַל הַקְּדֵרוֹת חַיָּב. וְאִם הִכְנִיס בִּרְשׁוּת, בַּעַל חָצֵר חַיָּב. הִכְנִיס פֵּרוֹתָיו לַחֲצַר בַּעַל הַבַּיִת שֶׁלֹּא בִרְשׁוּת, וַאֲכָלָתַן בְּהֶמְתּוֹ שֶׁל בַּעַל הַבַּיִת, פָּטוּר. וְאִם הֻזְּקָה בָהֶן, בַּעַל הַפֵּרוֹת חַיָּב. וְאִם הִכְנִיס בִּרְשׁוּת, בַּעַל הֶחָצֵר חַיָּב:

If a potter brought his pots into the courtyard of the ba'al habayith (the owner of the courtyard) without permission, and the beast of the ba'al habayith broke them, he (the ba'al habayith) is not liable. And if it were injured by them, the potter is liable. And if he brought them in with permission, the ba'al habayith is liable. If one brought his fruits into the courtyard of the ba'al habayith without permission and the beast of the ba'al habayith ate them, he is not liable. And if it were injured by them, the owner of the fruits is liable. [This, if it slipped on them and were hurt; but if it ate of them until it died, the owner of the fruits is not liable. For (he can contend that) it should not have eaten.]

Explore reference for Bava Kamma 5:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.